- Union City Planning Commission
and Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Minutes
-
- Third Quarter 1999
-
- July
13, 1999, Meeting Minutes
- Aug.
10, 1999, Meeting Minutes
July 13,
1999
PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
- Members Present:
- Dale Shields
- Mayor Packard
Larry Beyer
- Glynn Marsh
- City Staff
Members Present:
- John Applegate
- Janet Hamilton
Mr. Shields called the planning commission meeting to order and
attendance was taken.
- 1. Mr. Shields
asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes
from the last meeting held on May 11, 1999. There were none so
Mr. Marsh moved that the minutes be approved. Mr. Shields seconded
the motion. All concurred and the minutes were accepted as prepared.
- 2. 99-11 Application
for final plat approval for Irongate Estates, Section IV.
- Mr. Applegate
said they were still missing some details, items 1 through 6,
from Thomas Winemiller and Associates that had been requested
by Woolpert Consultants. Items 7 and 8 have been taken care of.
- Mr. Applegate
said he wanted to address a letter from Mr. Winemiller about
the way the city was doing things.
- Mr. Applegate
relayed some Union history concerning storm water concerns with
Concord Farms West, Section III and that the bridge was washed
out at State Route 48.
To correct the problem, in response to a property owners concerns,
Mr. Applegate said that he and Doug Balsbaugh of Balsbaugh Excavating
had put a ditch through the area, connecting the two points and
the system had worked well for many years. The city did not have
an easement and it was done with a handshake agreement and satisfied
the property owner.
- Since Irongate
Estates has now been created, there has been as easement created.
Mr. Applegate said the current ditch had nothing to do with Woolpert
Engineering, Ryan Homes, or Mark Brumbaugh, the previous owner.
Now the easement will be deeded to the city.
- Mr. Applegate
relayed a few more comments from the letter from Mr. Winemiller.
One of the comments referred to problems with Lindeman Commons.
Mr. Applegate said there had been a difference of an agreement
on storm water flow between Mr. Winemiller, the engineer for
Lindeman Commons, and Bill Landis, the engineer for Mill Ridge
Village.
Mr. Applegate informed the commission how a few drainage problems
had been corrected along with several other difficulties.
Mr. Applegate said there had been several disagreements between
two engineers. Mr. Applegate said he was not sure why they were
having a problem.
Mr. Applegate added that the City of Union engineers were being
criticized and Mr. Applegate was trying to remain neutral. He
said that the city was the one that needed to be satisfied.
- Mr. Beyer
said if Irongate Estates did not satisfy the requirements of
the city, their final plan would not be approved.
Mr. Beyer suggested William Dries, who was present at the meeting,
should have his engineer sit down with the city's engineer. If
they could not work things out, then the planning commission
could go home.
Mr. Beyer said he did not want Irongate Estates to not be completed.
He felt that they should be able to work out the problems.
- Mr. Applegate
said that he knew that Mr. Dries wanted to move forward and that
he recommended approval of the final plan, contingent upon the
six items listed from Woolperts being completed by Thomas Winemiller
and Associates.
- In response
to a question from Mr. Marsh, Mr. Applegate said the items were
not major concerns - they were simple things but still needed
to be addressed.
- Mr. Beyer
asked if a date for time of completion should be set. Mr. Applegate
said that is why he contacted Mr. Dries.
Mr. Applegate gave some examples of the items that need to be
answered, like having a rail along a drainage ditch. Mr. Dries
said he would like to take a look at the items. He said some
may require some thought, like for example, instead of a rail
and maybe he would want to install a decorative wall on either
side. Mr. Applegate said it was a safety concern and those details
needed to be indicated on the drawings. Mr. Applegate said whether
the engineer for Irongate disliked or disagreed with the city's
engineer's comments, they still needed the items answered.
- Mr. Dries
said he had talked to Mr. Applegate on Friday and that he knew
there were a number of insignificant items that needed to be
addressed. Mayor Packard asked Mr. Winemiller if there was a
problem in working these problems out. Mr. Winemiller said he
didn't know what they were yet.
Mayor Packard said Irongate Estates was a nice looking development.
Mr. Marsh asked if Mr. Winemiller had a problem with two weeks
to respond to Woolpert's comments.
Mr. Winemiller said there was a request for a change of pipe
and the addition of a box culvert.
Mr. Applegate said in a severe rain, the ditch does fill up and
they have had problems with water on Barnside. When issuing permits
for Irongate, Mr. Applegate said they made sure the pad elevations
were above the grade so the houses would not be flooded.
Mr. Packard moved that the final plan for Irongate Estates, Section
IV, be approved contingent upon the completion or response to
the six items mentioned in the letter from Woolperts dated July
13, the answers to be completed in thirty days.
Mr. Beyer seconded the motion. All concurred and 99-11 was approved.
3. Mr. Shields moved that the planning commission meeting be
adjourned. Mr. Beyer seconded the motion. All concurred and the
planning commission meeting was adjourned.
-
- Back
to top of page.
-
-
- Aug. 10,
1999
-
- BOARD OF
ZONING APPEALS MINUTES
- Members Present:
- Dale Shields
- Mayor Packard
Lynn Thomas-Roth
- Glynn Marsh
- City Staff
Members Present:
- John Applegate
- Denise Winemiller
-
- Mr. Shields
called the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting to order and attendance
was taken.
- 1. Mr. Shields
asked if anyone had any corrections or additions to the minutes
from the April 13, 1999 meeting. There were none so Mr. Marsh
moved that the minutes be approved as prepared. Mrs. Thomas-Roth
seconded the motion. All the members concurred and the minutes
were accepted as prepared.
- 2. 99-12 -
Variance request from Jeff Samuelson of the JZ Companies, for
Lot 260/261, 143/145 Warner Drive, for Union Ridge Development,
for a one foot side yard variance and a three foot rear yard
variance.
- Mr. Applegate
introduced Hiram Gutterman representing JZ Homes.
Mr. Applegate said this would be the only lot that JZ Homes owns
that needs a variance. The other lots are a regular shape and
have room for the doubles to fit on the lots. This lot is located
on a curb and the customer wanted the four foot expanded version
of the double offered by JZ Homes.
Mr. Marsh asked if they had started on the building. Mr. Gutterman
said he thought they were working on the footer. Mr. Marsh said
he had taken a trip out to the site and the footer was in. Mr.
Marsh said he wished that JZ Homes had approached the Board of
Zoning Appeals first before going ahead with the construction.
Mr. Packard also commented that he would have liked to have been
notified before the construction was started. Mr. Gutterman offered
to pass their comments along to Mr. Samuelson.
Mr. Marsh moved to grant the variance request. Mr. Shields seconded
the motion. All concurred and the variance was granted.
- 3. 99-13 -
Variance request from Mike Temple and Rodney Malott for Lot 3,
105/107 Ridgeview Court for Ridgeview Woods, for a five foot
variance for the west side of the property.
- Mr. Applegate
introduced the owner and builder, Mike Temple. Mayor Packard
asked Mr. Applegate to indicate the location of the lot and development
on the map.
- Mr. Applegate
said the building planned is a beautiful double and will be Mr.
Temple's residence. The lot has a sanitary sewer easement which
can not be built upon and the lot is very steep. Mr. Applegate
said the staff did not have a problem with fitting the building
on the lot. In response to a question from Mr. Shields, behind
the lot is a flood plain district so no additional homes will
be built behind the proposed double.
- Mr. Packard
moved to grant the variance request for Ridgeview Woods. Mr.
Marsh seconded the motion. All concurred and the variance was
granted.
- 4. Mr. Shields
moved that the meeting be adjourned. Mr. Packard seconded the
motion. All concurred and the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting
was adjourned.
-
- Back
to top of page.
|